All Races
House Primary · March 18, 2026Decided

IL-08

Illinois 8th Congressional District

$4,100,000
Total AIPAC spending via 2 shell PACs

Candidates

Omar Siddiqui
DemocratAIPAC-targeted
Won
Teresa Fajardo
DemocratAIPAC-backed
Lost

Shell PACs Deployed

Elect Chicago Women$2.9M
Registered January 27, 2026 · Funded by United Democracy Project (AIPAC)

Cross-deployed from IL-07 to run anti-Siddiqui ads focused on his business record and tax positions.

Affordable Chicago Now!$1.2M
Registered January 30, 2026 · Funded by United Democracy Project (AIPAC)

Funded mailers boosting Fajardo's community engagement credentials.

Timeline

February 8, 2026'Elect Chicago Women' begins running ads in IL-08 targeting Siddiqui.
February 20, 2026Siddiqui campaign releases detailed policy platform on Palestine, calls for arms embargo.
March 2, 2026Progressive counter-PAC enters IL-08 with $1.5M ad buy backing Siddiqui.
March 12, 2026Polls show Siddiqui leading despite being outspent 3-to-1 on airwaves.
March 18, 2026Primary Election Day. Siddiqui wins with 51.3% in an upset. AIPAC's candidate Fajardo concedes.

The Story

The Illinois 8th was one of AIPAC's most embarrassing defeats in the 2026 cycle. Despite pouring $4.1 million into the race through the same shell PAC network used across Illinois, UDP's preferred candidate Teresa Fajardo lost to Omar Siddiqui, who had explicitly campaigned on conditioning aid to Israel and supporting an arms embargo.

Siddiqui's win was powered by an energized grassroots coalition and late intervention from the counter-PAC that launched with $10 million specifically to fight AIPAC's influence in Democratic primaries. The race demonstrated that AIPAC's money, while formidable, is not invincible — particularly in districts with diverse, politically engaged electorates where voters resent outside interference.

The result was especially significant because Siddiqui did not shy away from the foreign policy debate. Unlike some candidates who tried to avoid the Israel question, he leaned into it, making AIPAC's spending itself a campaign issue. His 51.3% victory proved that transparency about who is funding your opponent can be a winning message.