Data

Original Research

Shell PAC Registry

Tracking pop-up super PACs that obscure the source of lobby money in elections. These are political action committees created with generic names to hide their connection to AIPAC and the pro-Israel lobby network.

8PACs tracked
$155.2Mtotal spending
6/8undisclosed before vote

What Is a Shell PAC?

A shell PAC is a political action committee registered with a generic, local-sounding name that gives no indication of who actually funds it. AIPAC's super PAC (United Democracy Project) creates these shell PACs weeks before elections to run millions in ads about local issues — housing, healthcare, infrastructure — while the real motivation is the target candidate's stance on Israel policy. Because FEC disclosure rules allow delayed reporting, voters often never learn who funded the ads until after they've already voted.

All Tracked Shell PACs

Elect Chicago Women

Dormant Not Before Election

Registered January 27, 2026 · Illinois · IL-07, IL-08, IL-09 Primaries

$11,500,000spent
United Democracy Project (AIPAC)
3 days after the March 18, 2026 election

Ran TV, digital, and mail ads in three Illinois congressional primaries. Ads focused entirely on local issues — constituent services, progressive credentials, city infrastructure — without ever mentioning Israel or foreign policy. Deployed across IL-07 (backing Norington-Reaves), IL-08 (opposing Siddiqui), and IL-09 (backing Simmons).

TV adsmailersdigital adsOpposing Jonathan Jackson (IL-07), Omar Siddiqui (IL-08), Lakesia Collins (IL-09)

Affordable Chicago Now!

Dormant Not Before Election

Registered January 30, 2026 · Illinois · IL-02, IL-08, IL-09 Primaries

$5,100,000spent
United Democracy Project (AIPAC)
3 days after the March 18, 2026 election

Focused on cost-of-living and affordable housing messaging across three Illinois races. Boosted AIPAC-backed candidates' records on healthcare and housing without disclosing who funded the ads until after voters had already cast ballots. Active in IL-02 (boosting Kelly), IL-08 (boosting Fajardo), and IL-09 (cost-of-living messaging in Evanston/Skokie).

TV adsmailersdigital adsOpposing Marcus Lewis (IL-02), Omar Siddiqui (IL-08)

Chicago Progressive Partnership

Dormant Not Before Election

Registered February 3, 2026 · Illinois · IL-07, IL-02, IL-09 Primaries

$5,400,000spent
United Democracy Project (AIPAC)
3 days after the March 18, 2026 election

Designed to co-opt progressive branding. Ran digital and mail campaigns framing AIPAC-backed candidates as the 'true progressive' choice. In IL-07, muddied the policy waters around Norington-Reaves. In IL-02, defended Kelly's progressive credentials. In IL-09, positioned Simmons as the heir to Schakowsky's legacy.

mailersdigital adsOpposing Jonathan Jackson (IL-07), Marcus Lewis (IL-02), Lakesia Collins (IL-09)

United Democracy Project (UDP)

Active Disclosed

Registered January 25, 2022 · National · Multiple (2022, 2024, 2026 cycles)

$96,000,000spent
AIPAC donor network
Quarterly FEC filings (not before elections where shell PACs are used)

AIPAC's official super PAC and the parent entity behind the shell PAC network. UDP ended 2025 with a $96M war chest. Rather than spending directly under its own name in most races, UDP creates or funds purpose-built shell PACs weeks before elections, distancing AIPAC's brand from the attack ads. Spent directly in the NJ Senate race through Garden State Forward and New Jersey Families First.

TV adsmailersdigital adsshell PAC fundingopposition researchOpposing Multiple progressive candidates critical of Israel policy

Garden State Forward

Dissolved Not Before Election

Registered November 15, 2024 · New Jersey · NJ Senate Primary

$3,200,000spent
United Democracy Project (AIPAC)
Donors disclosed in quarterly FEC filing after primary

Created five months before the New Jersey Senate primary to boost Tammy Murphy and attack Andy Kim. Ran TV ads questioning Kim's electability and fiscal policy positions while positioning Murphy as the 'safe' choice. None of the ads mentioned Israel, AIPAC, or foreign policy — the actual reason the spending existed.

TV adsdigital adsOpposing Andy Kim

New Jersey Families First

Dissolved Not Before Election

Registered December 1, 2024 · New Jersey · NJ Senate Primary

$1,300,000spent
United Democracy Project (AIPAC)
Donors disclosed in quarterly FEC filing after primary

Second shell PAC deployed in the New Jersey Senate race. Funded mailers in suburban counties questioning Andy Kim's experience while positioning Tammy Murphy as the 'safer' choice for New Jersey families. Dissolved after Murphy dropped out of the race in April 2025.

mailersOpposing Andy Kim

Mainstream Democrats PAC

Dormant Not Before Election

Registered March 2024 · National · Multiple 2024 Democratic Primaries

$8,700,000spent
United Democracy Project (AIPAC)
Quarterly FEC filings

Deployed in the 2024 cycle to oppose progressive candidates in Democratic primaries. The name 'Mainstream Democrats' was chosen to signal electability concerns rather than foreign policy motivations. Used in races where AIPAC-backed candidates faced progressive challengers who supported conditioning aid to Israel.

TV adsdigital adsmailersOpposing Multiple progressive primary candidates

Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI) PAC

Active Disclosed

Registered January 2019 · National · Multiple (2020, 2022, 2024 cycles)

$24,000,000spent
Pro-Israel donor network (aligned with AIPAC)
Quarterly FEC filings

Not technically a UDP shell PAC but operates as a parallel arm of the pro-Israel spending network. DMFI spends in races where UDP/AIPAC doesn't want its name attached. Ran major campaigns against progressive candidates in the 2024 Democratic primaries. Uses polling and focus-grouped messaging to attack candidates on local issues while the actual motivation is their stance on Israel.

TV adsdigital adspollingopposition researchOpposing Progressive Democratic primary candidates

How Shell PACs Work

01

Donors Fund AIPAC's Super PAC

Wealthy pro-Israel donors contribute to AIPAC, which funnels money to United Democracy Project (UDP) — its official super PAC. UDP ended 2025 with a $96 million war chest. Individual donors are disclosed in quarterly FEC filings, but the timing ensures voters rarely see the donor list before election day.

02

UDP Creates Shell PACs

Weeks before an election, UDP registers new PACs with the FEC using generic, local-sounding names — 'Elect Chicago Women,' 'Affordable Chicago Now!' — that obscure any connection to AIPAC or Israel. UDP transfers millions to these shell PACs. The new PAC names appear on ads instead of AIPAC.

03

Shell PAC Runs Ads, Hides Source

The shell PAC spends millions on TV, mail, and digital ads attacking or boosting candidates. Ads focus exclusively on local issues — healthcare, housing, infrastructure — never mentioning Israel or foreign policy. Donor disclosure is delayed until after voters have cast ballots. The shell PAC often goes dormant or dissolves after the election.

Timeline: When Were They Created?

Shell PACs are typically registered weeks — not months — before election day. This narrow window maximizes the gap between ad spending and donor disclosure, ensuring voters never learn who funded the ads before casting their ballots.

Jan 2019DMFI PAC registered
Jan 2022UDP registered with FEC
Mar 2024Mainstream Democrats PAC created
Nov 15, 2024Garden State Forward created
Dec 1, 2024NJ Families First created
Jun 4, 2025ElectionNJ Senate Primary
Jan 27, 2026Elect Chicago Women created
Jan 30, 2026Affordable Chicago Now! created
Feb 3, 2026Chicago Progressive Partnership created
Mar 18, 2026ElectionIllinois Primaries (IL-02, IL-07, IL-08, IL-09)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a shell PAC?

A shell PAC is a political action committee created with a generic-sounding name to hide the true source of its funding. In the context of pro-Israel lobby spending, AIPAC's super PAC (United Democracy Project) creates shell PACs with names like 'Elect Chicago Women' or 'Affordable Chicago Now!' that give no indication of their connection to AIPAC or Israel policy. These PACs are often registered weeks before an election, spend millions on ads about local issues, and dissolve after the race is over.

Why do lobbies use shell PACs instead of spending directly?

Shell PACs serve two purposes: brand distancing and delayed disclosure. If voters saw 'Paid for by AIPAC' on every attack ad, many would question why an Israel lobby is spending millions in a local race. By using shell PACs with local-sounding names, the true funder stays hidden. Additionally, FEC disclosure rules allow these PACs to delay reporting their donors until after the election — meaning voters never know who paid for the ads before they cast their ballots.

Are shell PACs legal?

Yes. Under current FEC regulations, creating a new PAC with any name is legal. Super PACs can fund other PACs, and disclosure timelines allow donors to remain hidden until quarterly filing deadlines — which often fall after election day. Critics argue this amounts to legalized dark money within a system that is technically 'disclosed.' Several reform proposals in Congress would require real-time donor disclosure, but none have passed.

How does Gen Us track shell PACs?

We monitor FEC registration filings for new PACs created in the weeks before elections, cross-reference funding sources through donor disclosure reports, and track spending through independent expenditure filings. We also analyze the timing of PAC creation relative to election dates and the gap between spending and donor disclosure to identify patterns consistent with shell PAC operations.

How much have shell PACs spent in the 2026 election cycle?

In the 2026 cycle, shell PACs funded by United Democracy Project (AIPAC) spent over $22 million in the Illinois March primaries alone through three shell PACs: Elect Chicago Women, Affordable Chicago Now!, and Chicago Progressive Partnership. None disclosed their donors before election day. Total shell PAC spending across all tracked cycles exceeds $155 million.

Related Data