The $3.3 Billion Hotel Secret: Why a 1947 Union Purge Still Matters
Modern New York labor is still shaped by a Cold War-era crackdown. We trace the money from 1930s blueprints to today's multi-billion dollar hotel industry.
Michael Obermeier’s deportation wasn't just about politics. It was a calculated legal move under the Taft-Hartley Act to force New York’s most powerful hotel union to choose between its radical roots and its legal right to operate.
In April 1947, federal agents walked into the New York offices of Local 6 to haul Michael J. Obermeier away. Modern stories like to focus on his status as an "undesirable alien," but the move was actually a surgical strike. Obermeier had done what few others could: he'd secured a master contract covering nearly every major hotel in the city. As a German immigrant and a heavy hitter in the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), he was caught in a trap between his own ideological loyalties and the brand-new Taft-Hartley Act.
The money involved was massive, and it still is. Today, the New York Hotel Trades Council represents about 40,000 workers and maintains a 90% grip on the city's hotel industry. That's a sector that pours over $3.3 billion in tax revenue into New York City every year. The shift from the "militantLoaded Language" leadership of the 1930s to the pragmatic unionism that eventually endorsed Republicans like George Pataki wasn't an accident. It was a survival strategy forced by federal law.
Then there's the Comintern. That's the Communist International, an organization started in 1919 to push for world communism and give specific orders to labor organizers everywhere. Jacobin likes to paint CPUSA influence as something purely organic, but the records tell a different story. The "boring from within" strategy, where communists took over leadership in existing unions, was a deliberate move. This connection gave the U.S. government the legal excuse it needed to classify union leaders as foreign agents rather than just dissidents.
“By 1947, Local 6 had grown from a scrappy group to a force representing 27,000 workers, making it a primary target for federal intervention.”
The original Jacobin report skips over the fine print of the Taft-Hartley Act, the 1947 law that put unions on a short leash. Section 9(h) was the real hammer. It required union officers to sign affidavits swearing they weren't communists. If a leader refused, the union lost its standing with the National Labor Relations Board. That meant they couldn't hold government-certified elections or even file unfair labor practice charges. For a union with 27,000 members, the choice was brutal: keep Obermeier or keep your legal right to exist.
Obermeier’s perjury conviction, which led to his deportation, was based on his 1945 citizenship application where he denied being in the CPUSA. But the internal drama was just as complicated. The "rank-and-file" movements that people love to romanticize were often funded and run through the Trade Union Unity League, which got its support directly from the CPUSA. By ignoring these financial ties, today's conversation gives us a sanitized version of history that misses the real "red lines" of the Cold War.
We can't verify exactly how much CPUSA cash was funneled into Local 6 during the 1930s. Those ledgers are lost to history. But we can see what the purge actually did. By the 1950s, the hotel union had become a stable, institutional player that chose "labor peace" over the class struggle. This shift let the union survive the era, but it also turned it into a political machine that could trade its massive voting block for legislative favors. It's a far cry from Obermeier's original vision.
For workers today, the lesson isn't just about political labels. It's about how legal frameworks like Taft-Hartley are used to decapitate successful movements by targeting the leadership's outside ties. As the hotel industry keeps consolidating under global private equity firms, the history of Local 6 is a reminder: labor power is often traded for legal legitimacy. Watch how modern leaders handle "political neutrality" clauses in today's contracts. The ghosts of 1947 are still in the room.
Summary
Some modern retellings of Michael J. Obermeier’s 1952 deportation treat it as a simple case of political bullying. But that’s only half the story. To understand what happened to the Local 6 leader, you have to look at the legal traps in the Taft-Hartley Act and the Comintern's actual directives. Obermeier didn't just run a union: he controlled a 27,000-worker powerhouse in the heart of New York's economy. While Jacobin's recent coverage acts as a promo for Shaun Richman’s new book, it skips a hard truth: the union only survived because it cut out the very radicals who built it. We're following the money from 1930s blueprints to the $3.3 billion industry we see today.
⚡ Key Facts
- Michael J. Obermeier, president of Local 6, was arrested in 1947 and later deported for his Communist Party membership and perjury.
- Shaun Richman is the author of 'We Always Had a Union: The New York Hotel Workers’ Union, 1912–1953'.
- The New York hotel workers' union represents more than 90 percent of hotel workers in New York.
- Michael J. Obermeier was a founding member of the Communist Party in 1921.
The $3.3 Billion Hotel Secret: Why a 1947 Union Purge Still Matters
Network of Influence
- Jacobin (subscription sales)
- Shaun Richman (book promotion)
- Socialist and leftist political movements (narrative reinforcement)
- Organized labor (positive historical framing)
- The specific goals and international directives of the Comintern (Communist International) during the 1920s-1940s are omitted.
- The legal details of the perjury conviction that led to Obermeier's deportation are glossed over.
- The fact that many mainstream labor unions purged Communist members in the late 1940s to comply with the Taft-Hartley Act is not mentioned.
- The article does not provide the counter-perspective of why the U.S. government viewed Comintern-affiliated individuals as national security risks during the early Cold War.
The article frames Communism as a foundational and heroic force in American labor history while drawing a direct parallel between 1950s 'Red Scare' tactics and modern-day conservative immigration policies to create a sense of historical urgency and political continuity.