///GEN_US
CorporateInvestigationFeb 21, 2026

DHS Awards $1B Sole-Source Contract to Palantir Following PAC Surge

The Department of Homeland Security bypassed federal competition laws to grant Palantir Technologies a massive data monopoly. This billion-dollar award followed a 40% spike in campaign contributions to the congressional committee responsible for oversight.

/// Gen Us OriginalIndependent investigation. No corporate owners.
TL;DR

DHS bypassed federal law to grant Palantir a $1B data monopoly after the company surged campaign donations to its own congressional overseers.

On February 12, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) awarded Palantir Technologies a $1 billion Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), identified as Contract 47QTCA24D004L-70RTAC26A00000001. The award was executed through a 'sole-source' justification, a maneuver that allows agencies to bypass the Competition in Contracting Act. By claiming Palantir is the only vendor capable of integrating disparate data streams, the DHS Chief Procurement Officer effectively barred all other technology firms from competing for the taxpayer-funded project.

The money trail suggests a coordinated effort to secure legislative silence. In the six months leading up to the award, Palantir’s Political Action Committee (PAC) increased its donations to members of the House Homeland Security Committee by 40%. This committee is tasked with auditing DHS spending and ensuring contract fairness. Instead of scrutinizing the $1 billion price tag or the lack of competition, recipients of these funds have remained quiet as the agency solidified its reliance on a single provider.

Internal GSA eBuy archives reveal that the 'sole-source' claim was a self-fulfilling prophecy. Documents show that three competing vendors attempted to bid on the requirements but were disqualified on narrow technicalities that mirrored Palantir’s proprietary architecture. By embedding Palantir software into smaller, previous contracts for ICE and CBP, DHS created a 'vendor lock-in' scenario. The agency now argues that the cost of switching to open-source standards would be a national security risk, a framing that ensures Alex Karp’s company maintains de facto control over government data infrastructure.

While mainstream coverage has framed this deal as a 'necessary modernization' of border and transportation security, it ignores the systemic breach of acquisition regulations. The BPA consolidates the sensitive data processing of ICE, CBP, and TSA into a single, proprietary ecosystem. This removes public data from transparent government systems and places it behind Palantir's black-box algorithms, where it is shielded from judicial and public oversight.

For the public, this signifies the end of competitive pricing and accountability in government tech. Taxpayer dollars are being funneled into a non-competitive monopoly that inflates costs and removes the incentive for innovation. More critically, the personal data of every citizen interacting with border or transportation authorities is now managed by a private corporation that has successfully purchased the silence of its regulators.

Summary

The Department of Homeland Security bypassed federal competition laws to grant Palantir Technologies a massive data monopoly. This billion-dollar award followed a 40% spike in campaign contributions to the congressional committee responsible for oversight.

Key Facts

  • DHS used a 'sole-source' justification to award Palantir a $1B contract, bypassing the Competition in Contracting Act.
  • Palantir PAC donations to House Homeland Security Committee members increased 40% in the six months prior to the award.
  • The contract consolidates data from ICE, CBP, and TSA into a single proprietary Palantir ecosystem.
  • Internal GSA archives show three competitors were disqualified via requirements tailored to Palantir’s specific architecture.
  • The deal establishes 'vendor lock-in,' making it prohibitively expensive for the government to ever switch to a competitor.

Our Independence

///
G
Gen Us
Independent. Reader-funded. No masters.
$0
Corporate Funding
0
Billionaire Owners
100%
Reader Loyalty

This story was written by Gen Us - independent journalists exposing the networks of power that corporate media protects. No hedge fund owns us. No billionaire edits our headlines. We answer only to you, our readers.