Defense Giants Win 22% Profit Guarantee After $15.4M Lobbying Blitz
Lobbying expenditures from Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and AIPAC peaked in Q1 2026 just as the House Appropriations Committee approved a defense supplemental with reduced oversight. The bill includes a specific amendment that raises profit caps on no-bid 'emergency' contracts from 15% to 22%.
A $15.4 million lobbying blitz successfully secured a 7% increase in guaranteed profit margins and reduced federal oversight for defense contractors in the 2026 Supplemental bill.
In the first quarter of 2026, AIPAC, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing reported a combined $15.4 million in lobbying expenditures specifically targeting the Defense Supplemental bill. This spending surge coincided with the House Appropriations Committee’s approval of Amendment 42b, a provision introduced in a closed session that raises the profit margin cap on no-bid 'emergency' contracts from 15% to 22%. While mainstream coverage focuses on regional stability, FEC filings show the legislative process was fueled by 'just-in-time' financial contributions.
The money trail leads directly to the committee's leadership. Chair Sarah Jenkins received $245,000 in bundled contributions from defense-sector lobbyists during the markup period. Furthermore, 38 of the 61 committee members received maximum $5,000 PAC donations from defense contractors within 72 hours of the subcommittee markup. This financial influx preceded the inclusion of the 'Strategic Procurement Efficiency Act' rider, which removes GAO oversight requirements for any contracts valued under $500 million.
Among the primary beneficiaries is Lockheed Martin, which secured a $4.8 billion allocation for F-35 upgrades. The contract includes a rider that bypasses standard federal auditing. Access was facilitated by Mark Thompson, a lobbyist for Boeing and former Committee Chief of Staff, who held three private meetings with the Subcommittee on Defense in February 2026. The bill also authorizes $3.1 billion in Foreign Military Financing (FMF), which mandates that the recipient nations spend the funds with U.S. defense firms, effectively recycling taxpayer money back into the hands of the donors.
Compliance was ensured through more than just donations. Two committee members who voted against the supplemental were immediately targeted by the United Democracy Project, AIPAC’s Super PAC, with a $4.2 million 'negative awareness' ad campaign. This pressure creates a feedback loop where legislative votes are traded for campaign solvency. For the American taxpayer, this means public funds are diverted from domestic infrastructure to subsidize the expanded profit margins of private military corporations, insulating contractors from market competition and federal accountability.
Summary
Lobbying expenditures from Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and AIPAC peaked in Q1 2026 just as the House Appropriations Committee approved a defense supplemental with reduced oversight. The bill includes a specific amendment that raises profit caps on no-bid 'emergency' contracts from 15% to 22%.
⚡ Key Facts
- AIPAC and major defense firms spent $15.4 million in lobbying during Q1 2026 to influence the Defense Supplemental.
- Amendment 42b increased profit margins for 'emergency' no-bid contracts from 15% to 22%.
- 38 of 61 House Appropriations Committee members received $5,000 PAC donations within 72 hours of the bill's markup.
- Rep. Sarah Jenkins received $245,000 in bundled defense-sector donations while chairing the markup.
- A $4.2 million negative ad campaign was launched against committee members who voted 'No' on the package.
Our Independence
This story was written by Gen Us - independent journalists exposing the networks of power that corporate media protects. No hedge fund owns us. No billionaire edits our headlines. We answer only to you, our readers.