LIVE
62% BS [Jacobin]Manhattan DA Dismisses Felony Hate Crime Charges Against Journalist Documenting Gaza Protestpolitics•
0% BSFormer FDA Officials Join Pharma Boards Before 15% Medicare Price HikesCorporate•
0% BSBillionaires Fund $100 Million Super PAC to Target Anti-Aid IncumbentsPolitics•
0% BSRTX Lands $1.4B No-Bid Missile Deals Months After Hiring Pentagon Procurement ChiefCorporate•
0% BSWSJ Claims Ohio Spill Impact Negligible Despite EPA Data Showing 400% ToxicityCorporate•
0% BSMSNBC Frames Drug Transparency as Risk While Taking $12.4M From Pharma LobbyCorporate•
0% BSNYT Cites Industry-Funded Expert to Justify $15 Billion Naval ExpansionCorporate•
0% BSDefense Contractors and AIPAC Drive Record $5.24 Billion 2025 Lobbying TotalPolitics•
62% BS [Jacobin]Manhattan DA Dismisses Felony Hate Crime Charges Against Journalist Documenting Gaza Protestpolitics•
0% BSFormer FDA Officials Join Pharma Boards Before 15% Medicare Price HikesCorporate•
0% BSBillionaires Fund $100 Million Super PAC to Target Anti-Aid IncumbentsPolitics•
0% BSRTX Lands $1.4B No-Bid Missile Deals Months After Hiring Pentagon Procurement ChiefCorporate•
0% BSWSJ Claims Ohio Spill Impact Negligible Despite EPA Data Showing 400% ToxicityCorporate•
0% BSMSNBC Frames Drug Transparency as Risk While Taking $12.4M From Pharma LobbyCorporate•
0% BSNYT Cites Industry-Funded Expert to Justify $15 Billion Naval ExpansionCorporate•
0% BSDefense Contractors and AIPAC Drive Record $5.24 Billion 2025 Lobbying TotalPolitics•
LEAD STORYIndieLeft62% BS
Manhattan DA Dismisses Felony Hate Crime Charges Against Journalist Documenting Gaza Protest
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has finally dropped the charges against photojournalist Alexa Wilkinson, ending a messy six-month felony prosecution that had First Amendment advocates up in arms. Wilkinson was targeted after filming a July 2024 protest where the New York Times building was vandalized. While the DA originally framed this as a targeted attack, the core of the case was a failed attempt to stick hate crime enhancements on a journalist who didn't actually participate in the property damage. Gen Us highlights the missing context regarding New York’s sealing laws and the specific legal theories the DA used to justify a home raid and property seizure against a member of the press.
DEEP DIVE
Editorial Board / Draft Review
Even in New York, Reporters Face Prison for Criticizing Israel
Manhattan DA Dismisses Felony Hate Crime Charges Against Journalist Documenting Gaza Protest
REJECTED
⚖️
Juxtaposition /// Same Story, Different Lens
1 / 18
Daily MailTheir Version5d ago
Email proves Charles was warned about his brother's 'secret deals': Whistleblower told Palace that Royal Family's name was being 'abused' by Andrew
Loaded language detected:
“bombshell”“abused”“sensationally”“secret deals”
58% BS
OriginalGen Us VersionGen Us
Leaked: King Charles’s Counsel Flagged Prince Andrew’s £1.5M 'Banking Favors'
Fact-Checked
Read Analysis →VS
"Daily Mail scored 58% BS. Same event. Different story. That's the point."
THE BLIND SPOT
What they report vs. what actually affects your life
Real Issues (77%)Media Noise (23%)
23
7
SILENCE MAP
3/11 BLIND SPOTSHousing
///Cost of LivingSILENT
///EducationSILENT
Healthcare
Climate
Labor
Infrastructure
///ImmigrationSILENT
Justice
Surveillance
Global Conflict
WHAT THEY LEFT OUT
“The specific content of the 'communication' that led to the hate crime charge is not fully detailed, only alluded to.”///“The legal threshold for a hate crime in New York state often involves targeting specific groups, which the DA's office initially alleged but later failed to prove to their own satisfaction.”///“The article does not mention that cases are legally 'sealed' as a standard privacy protection for individuals whose charges are dismissed, rather than as an act of secrecy by the DA.”///“The article does not address potential criticisms or limitations of 'power structure research,' such as data privacy concerns or the potential for methodology to be used by opposing political/corporate interests.”///“It lacks a neutral perspective on the conflicts mentioned (e.g., Columbia University protests, South African apartheid) to provide balance.”///“The article frames the 2025 NYC mayoral election as a past/current event, implying it is likely a speculative or future-dated piece of fiction or advocacy.”///“It omits the economic arguments for state preemption laws, such as maintaining a uniform regulatory environment for businesses across a state.”///“It does not address the potential cost increases to taxpayers associated with Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) or labor peace agreements.”///“The article fails to explain the stated environmental goals of conservation tokens, such as verifiable carbon sequestration or anti-poaching funding.”///“It omits the voluntary nature of the pilot programs in Panama and the specific regulatory frameworks they operate under.”///“There is no mention of the decentralized potential of blockchain which many advocates use specifically to bypass 'elite' financial institutions.”///“Lack of detailed rebuttal from the Indian government regarding surveillance claims.”///“Omission of specific Indian AI success stories or existing digital infrastructure projects that support the 'AI hub' claim.”///“The historical context of the UK, Korea, and France summits is mentioned but their specific outcomes are not compared to Delhi's goals.”///“Total number of successful versus unsuccessful federal prosecutions for assaulting officers during the same period.”///“Specific legal thresholds for 'dismissal with prejudice' versus standard dismissals.”///“The overall conviction rate for Operation Metro Surge beyond the anecdotal failed cases mentioned.”///“The standard protocol for ICE body-worn cameras or lack thereof, which would explain why video evidence only surfaced later.”///“The article does not mention the Palace's official response or actions taken following the 2019 warning.”///“It lacks a legal verification status for the whistleblower's emails.”///“The specific content of the 'communication' that led to the hate crime charge is not fully detailed, only alluded to.”///“The legal threshold for a hate crime in New York state often involves targeting specific groups, which the DA's office initially alleged but later failed to prove to their own satisfaction.”///“The article does not mention that cases are legally 'sealed' as a standard privacy protection for individuals whose charges are dismissed, rather than as an act of secrecy by the DA.”///“The article does not address potential criticisms or limitations of 'power structure research,' such as data privacy concerns or the potential for methodology to be used by opposing political/corporate interests.”///“It lacks a neutral perspective on the conflicts mentioned (e.g., Columbia University protests, South African apartheid) to provide balance.”///“The article frames the 2025 NYC mayoral election as a past/current event, implying it is likely a speculative or future-dated piece of fiction or advocacy.”///“It omits the economic arguments for state preemption laws, such as maintaining a uniform regulatory environment for businesses across a state.”///“It does not address the potential cost increases to taxpayers associated with Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) or labor peace agreements.”///“The article fails to explain the stated environmental goals of conservation tokens, such as verifiable carbon sequestration or anti-poaching funding.”///“It omits the voluntary nature of the pilot programs in Panama and the specific regulatory frameworks they operate under.”///“There is no mention of the decentralized potential of blockchain which many advocates use specifically to bypass 'elite' financial institutions.”///“Lack of detailed rebuttal from the Indian government regarding surveillance claims.”///“Omission of specific Indian AI success stories or existing digital infrastructure projects that support the 'AI hub' claim.”///“The historical context of the UK, Korea, and France summits is mentioned but their specific outcomes are not compared to Delhi's goals.”///“Total number of successful versus unsuccessful federal prosecutions for assaulting officers during the same period.”///“Specific legal thresholds for 'dismissal with prejudice' versus standard dismissals.”///“The overall conviction rate for Operation Metro Surge beyond the anecdotal failed cases mentioned.”///“The standard protocol for ICE body-worn cameras or lack thereof, which would explain why video evidence only surfaced later.”///“The article does not mention the Palace's official response or actions taken following the 2019 warning.”///“It lacks a legal verification status for the whistleblower's emails.”///
Deep Dives
24 STORIESTRENDING NOW
GEN US
NO ALGORITHM. NO AGENDA. JUST RECEIPTS.